I have one philosophical law which governs my behavior and the behavior of my idealized society: no rational agent should ever use force against another. Private property law can't be derived from that, but it's a useful secondary axiom for avoiding the use of force.
The court's decision in this case does mean that force has been used against the property's owners.
While I hate to quote the underlying societal philosophy of Starship Troopers (ahem....) -
And force, my friends, is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.
We legally compel all sorts of actions. We obey these compulsions (in theory at least) because we know that if we don't we risk being forcibly compelled to comply or forcibly restricted in other ways, such as fines or imprisonment. I applaud your motives but rationally there is an underlying, implied force behind a great many actions between us.
The court's decision in this case does mean that force has been used against the property's owners.