To me, neither of them feels like AI generated. The tarot example feels like its inspiration came from collectible card games, while the ramen example reminds me of Cyberpunk 2077.
Honestly, I have a similar impressions after testing every model except Sonnet, Opus or Claude. I always test them inside Claude vscode extension in the terminal, using the same skills or workflows from multiple skills.
I tested Mimo V2.5 Pro, Qwen 3.8 Max Preview, GLM 5.2, Macaron V1 Venti and many other, smaller model whenever hype on X appears. All behave dumb, don't follow instructions properly even when they write skills for themselves. They are literally on the level of Sonnet 3.5 which was released in 2024 so I use them when available on free endpoints for simple tasks like writing or subtle UI improvements...
Gemini is the only LLM I've ever experienced that decided on its own to tell me that something was a bad idea. Which, ok, in itself it's not a bad thing, we actually need more of that instead of the pathological sycophancy that all current models suffer from.
But in a physical robot? Yeah, that thing is going to punch me in the face, eventually. Or worse.
I use Sonnet and Opus everyday. Believe me, it's very common they tell me that something is bad idea, write a rationale and suggest better solutions.
Gemini doesn't remember almost anything after 2-3 follow ups. I have to paste the same "system prompt" at the top of each message and it still doesn't understand it.
If you are unsure about the AI generated code, it's better to not ship a risky product. You can also use 3rd party services for the most vulnerable areas of your product.
100% Agree. It's not only about AI-generated but also real people, often celebrities, without proper qualifications who drop generic "health tips" videos without knowing who will be recipient of their tips.
