Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LAC-Tech's commentslogin

That's the wonderful thing about the Agile Manifesto - it says so little you can use it to justify anything.

Specs? The agile manifesto never said to stop writing specs!

Standups? Checmkate waterfallists, the agile manifesto never mentioned that!

Real software engineers have written written real papers on these things. We can forego the manifesto, which is just a few platitudes from consultants on a website.


The places where I've seen unequivocal wins with AI are repetitive tech debt tasks that apply the same transformation across a large amount of code or refactor under a pre-existing test suite with good coverage.

I agree with this, but I'd add the caveat you have to do your own digging and researching (as the article says) to identify these tasks well. If you ask it for ideas, it gets painful.

YMMV (and I am very open to getting better at this).


I still don't know it very well, and it's been well over a decade. I think it's a combination of a few things:

- I find it uninteresting. My version control needs are very simple.

- Most teams I have been in use a small subset of it.

- It's confusing terms and inconsistent cli are huge warning signs to not go down that rabbithole. Today instead of learning Git I read some Tony Hoare, much better.

I've been at once place where they rebased, and it was awful. Complete waste of time. (great place otherwise though)


Have you ever read any of the introductory material that the git project itself maintains for teaching how to use the tool?

- https://git-scm.com/docs/gittutorial

- https://git-scm.com/docs/giteveryday

- https://git-scm.com/docs/gitworkflows

- https://git-scm.com/docs/gitfaq

- https://git-scm.com/cheat-sheet

Or if you want to sit down and really learn the nuts and bolts

- https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2


Looks like an incredibly dull way to waste hours of my finite life for microscopic benefit.

The first five links (i.e. not the book) are each only a few printed pages worth of text each or less. All together they are equivalent to like a single chapter of text in a book.

It really won't take hours. You probably read more than that just looking at HN for like 20 minutes.


Give it an hour or two. It is really not that complicated. A little bit of investment will pay huge dividends. Do yourself the favor.

I could say the same for reading Tony Hoare.

yeah I would really love to see a subset of git with a sane cli. would switch in a heartbeat.

Git has been re-designing their tooling over the last few years. Nowadays there exist really pleasant, easy to use versions of the main tools.

switch and restore replaced checkout. history is being developed to replace rebase for most common use cases. maintenance replaces gc. etc.


Fossil?

Correct on both counts.

If I talked about how I needed to recover from being raised in a progressive environment, it would not be so well received in well-respected tech circles.

There's an assymetry here no one wants to acknowledge.


I don't know anyone who had to "recover" from being raised by "progressive" parents. Is this actually a thing? What would there be to recover from exactly?

See? I can't even mention it without scare quotes and downvotes :)

"Recover from my dad beating me" vs "recover from my dad not beating me".

Yes, really makes you think.


lmao. fish, water, etc.

These are just regular quotation marks. Sorry if they scared you.

I think the truth is whether people want to admit it or not is that coding has not been solved, and producing good software is really not any easier.

Making legacy code however is now very fast. So fast you can practically ship it straight to production.


All code is legacy code a millisecond after you write it.

Anecdotally I find I connect more with what I write by pen as well.

Ultimately I want things to in text documents though (typst for me these days). If there was a non-slopware solution to ocr scanning to a typst doc, I would do it a lot more .


I have been using LLMs for this and they excel and understanding my very poor calligraphy. All I do I take photos of the pages I wrote by hand, and then ask the LLM to convert those notes to markdown and convert any diagrams that I might have to mermaidjs style, and worked wonders for me.

Hmmm - I guess all the "chatbot" web interfaces for LLMs have an option to upload images. And they're really good at this now you say? That's a really useful tip; thanks.

Yeah they work really well. I have tried Claude opus and ChatGPT 5.5

Has all of this drama turned anyone else a bit sour on bun?

I have a long running side project I migrated to bun, and I'm starting to regret it. I don't want to build on top of this much churn.


Though I don't brand my site as indie web, my own website is a bit like this - I have a link to my consulting site and a headshot on there.

Why is that so bad? My professional life is a part of who I am. One could call me an IndieWorker, in that I'm self employed....


Got a link to share? (Maybe put it in your HN bio?)

lewiscampbell.tech

Good suggestion, I will :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: