No I haven't taken anything personally. I am trying to explain how this stuff works. Go back and read your recent replies to me then see how condescending and ridiculous you were (accusing me of having blind faith, not wanting to know how things work, etc). I truly don't care. I'm just trying to explain something. Too bad if I have to be so blunt. No offence taken. It's actually more funny than offensive.
I have a degree in Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. But so what? You don't need a degree to understand the basics.
You're looking for an explicit semantic coding inside a loss function, which doesn't make any sense. Of course you won't find any coding for semantics described in the paper, because the entire point of machine learning is that it figures that out automatically.
How the hell can you have a PhD in machine learning without understanding that?
I have a degree in Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. But so what? You don't need a degree to understand the basics.
You're looking for an explicit semantic coding inside a loss function, which doesn't make any sense. Of course you won't find any coding for semantics described in the paper, because the entire point of machine learning is that it figures that out automatically.
How the hell can you have a PhD in machine learning without understanding that?