Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is there any rocket-builder without a history of blowing things up?
 help



I feel like other rocket builders, whether private or government, have way less launches but they have more successful launches percentage wise than Space X.

And many more actual casualties?

The only thing that matters is that things do not blow up with humans onboard: SpaceX simply accepted blow-ups as part of development cost, made sure nobody was hurt when they happen, and ended up building a rocket to carry humans to ISS much faster than eg. Boeing who got a bigger grant and is still not trusted to do that and bring them back (having only launched once to ISS last year, and not bringing astronauts back). So both faster and cheaper, and with some spectacle included too (everybody likes fireworks, right?)

They also started at the same time, and Falcon is now considered old tech (because SpaceX has been blowing up their new tech in the meantime).


Saturn 1 and 1B didn't have failure I think ? Tho that's just one model

Made by Chrysler. They had plenty of failures with the Juno I and Juno II launchers.

Obviously not. Blowing things up is the reason for rocketry to exist and its historical basis.

A fun fact about SpaceX:

Remember our esteemed national American hero, and spiritual father of SpaceX, Wernher von Braun.

Wernher wrote a book about Mars referring to "The Elon", an imaginary Mars governing body.

The father of Elon Musk claimed that Elon's name came from there.

Well at least, that's what he claims. Reality doesn't matter if you have billions and power. History can be rewritten.


The publishing-houses print history books. The rich own the publishing-houses. Q.E.D. The rich control the history books.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: