Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How can they reason that evidence was destroyed when they can not prove it ever existed in the first place?


They don't need to reason that evidence was destroyed. They just need to reason they there was an attempt to destroy potential evidence, whether or not there was actually any evidence. Any kind of interference with an investigation in any way is likely subject to prosecution.


How can they in the GrapheneOS duress pin case?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: